|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]宋佳,傅延龄.李时珍“古一两今用一钱”剖析[J].环球中医药,2012,5(06):410-0.
　SONG Jia,FU Yan ling..Discussion on“one Liang in ancient times could be converted to one Qian in Ming Dynasty”proposed by LI Shizhen[J].,2012,5(06):410-0.
点击复制

李时珍“古一两今用一钱”剖析()
     
分享到：

《环球中医药》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
第5卷
期数:
2012年06期
页码:
410-0
栏目:
中药量效关系研究
出版日期:
2012-06-06

文章信息/Info

Title:
Discussion on“one Liang in ancient times could be converted to one Qian in Ming Dynasty”proposed by LI Shizhen
作者:
宋佳; 傅延龄;
Author(s):
SONG Jia; FU Yanling.
College of Basic Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China
关键词:
李时珍;  经方折算;  剂量;  文献研究
Keywords:
LI Shizhen; Dosage of convert in classical prescriptions; Dosage; Literature research
分类号:
R28
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过文献分析的方法 ,对李时珍在《本草纲目》中提出的"古一两今用一钱"进行了剖析,认为在李时珍生活的明代,"古一两今用一钱"基本符合当时医家对经方的折算概况,但此种折算标准是建立在两个基本前提之下:一是唐宋时期度量衡标准三倍于汉制的史实; 二是明代汤剂服法"一剂一服"的盛行。这两条基本前提给李时珍提出的结论提供了一定的合理性依据。
Abstract:
Based on the method of literature research, “one Liang(两) in ancient times could be converted to one Qian(钱) of Ming Dynasty” proposed by LI Shizhen in his masterpiece Compendium of Materia Medica is further analyzed. It is concluded that in Ming Dynasty, when LI Shizhen lived, “one Liang(两) in ancient times could be converted to one Qian(钱) of Ming Dynasty” basically accorded with the criterion of dosage convert of the medical practitioners in that period using the classical prescriptions in practice. The criterion of dosage convert was based on two preconditions: one was that the criterion of weights and measures in Tang and Song Dynasty was three times that in Eastern Han Dynasty; the other was that the decoction administration—“one dose one time” prevailed in Ming Dynasty. The two premise conditions provided rational basis for the conclusion put forward by LI Shizhen.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈长青.从李时珍一直错到中国药典[J].南风窗,2007,(14):3940.
[2]明·李时珍.李时珍医学全书[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,1996:50.
[3]清·钱潢.伤寒溯源集[M].上海:上海卫生出版社,1957:383,384.
[4]宋·庞安时.伤寒总病论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1989:9.
[5]宋·朱肱陈.类证活人书[M].上海:商务印书馆,1955:95.
[6]金·成无己.注解伤寒论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:34.
[7]元·王好古.汤液本草[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1987:36.
[8]明·许宏.金镜内台方议[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1986:173.
[9]明·陈嘉谟.本草蒙筌[M].合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1990:25.
[10]明·李中梓.伤寒括要[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1985:1.
[11]宋·陈言.三因极一病证方论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1957:1617.
[12]明·朱橚.普济方[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1959:119120.
[13]陆拯.王肯堂医学全书[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,1999:756.
[14]清·尤怡.医学读书记[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1983:57.
[15]李具双,付笑平.李时珍药用衡量析疑[J].中医文献杂志,2004,22(3):2527.
[16]吴承洛.中国度量衡史[M].上海:商务印书馆,1957:112.
[17]清·李冠仙.知医必辨[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1984:42.
[18]清·陈修园.医学实在易[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1959:8，73.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金课题：国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2010CB530604)
作者单位：100029 北京中医药大学基础医学院（宋佳），国际学院（傅延龄）
作者简介：宋佳(1983- )，女，医学博士，讲师。研究方向：方药量效关系的文献研究。Email：tcmsongjia@gmail.com
通讯作者：傅延龄（1959- ），医学博士，教授，主任医师，博士生导师，研究方向：方药量效关系的文献研究。Email：fuyanling@bucm.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01